Campbell v. Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
Daniel Campbell |
Warden Cynthia Davis and Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution |
2:2023cv03332 |
October 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Sarah D Morrison |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 1/8/2024. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution. (Rosenberg, Hilda) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Hilda Rosenberg for Respondent Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution (Rosenberg, Hilda) |
Filing 2 ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that Respondent shall file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases within sixty (60) days of the date of filing of this Order. Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution answer due 12/10/2023. Petitioner may, not later than twenty-one (21) days after the answer is filed, file and serve a reply to the answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 10/11/2023. (mas) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AOHSDC-9636556.), filed by Daniel Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Brief in Support) (Meehan, Catherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.