Ingram v. Amazon.com Services LLC, et al
| Carita Ingram |
| Amazon.com Services LLC and Daniel Gainer |
| 2:2023cv03531 |
| October 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Michael H Watson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint filed by Amazon.com Services LLC. (Orr, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND originally filed in Franklin County Court of Common Pleas on 9/21/2023; Case 23CV-09-6715 by Carita Ingram against Amazon.com Services LLC, Daniel Gainer. (mas) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com Sales, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Amazon.com, Inc., Corporate Parent Amazon.com Sales, Inc. for Amazon.com Services LLC.. (Orr, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, case number 23CV-09-6715 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9659649), filed by Amazon.com Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Jennifer Orr, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Zane Brown, #3 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Patrick Strawbridge, #4 Exhibit 4 - Civil Cover Sheet and Supplemental Cover Sheet) (Orr, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
