Whitacre v. Adult Parole Authority
Carl E. Whitacre |
Adult Parole Authority |
2:2023cv03625 |
November 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Algenon L Marbley |
Peter B Silvain |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The plaintiffs complaint be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). 2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997). re #1 Complaint filed by Carl E. Whitacre. Objections to R&R due by 1/2/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr on 12/18/23. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS AND ORDERING THE COLLECTION OF THE FULL FILING FEE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr on 12/15/23. (pb)(cashier)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE - Trust Fund Account by Plaintiff Carl E. Whitacre re #3 Deficiency Order (pb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE PRC Results by Plaintiff Carl E. Whitacre. (Attachments: #1 Env.) (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 3 DEFICIENCY ORDER - Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to pay $402 ($350 filing fee plus $52 administrative fee), or submit to the Court an in forma pauperis application and certified copy of plaintiffs prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prior six-month period within thirty (30) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr on 11/17/23. (pb)(cashier of the prison)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 2 STATEMENT OF FACT by Plaintiff Carl E. Whitacre (Attachments: #1 Env.) (jlk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Adult Parole Authority, filed by Carl E. Whitacre. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Env.) (jlk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Whitacre v. Adult Parole Authority | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carl E. Whitacre | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Adult Parole Authority | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.