Urell v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al
Plaintiff: Susan F. Urell
Defendant: Colgate-Palmolive Company, Marsha Butler, Hecho Studios LLC and Thomas L. Dunlap, III
Case Number: 2:2023cv03652
Filed: November 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Sarah D Morrison
Referring Judge: Chelsey M Vascura
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2023 Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. No Such Number. Unable to Forward. Mail sent to Susan Urell. (Attachments: #1 Contents of Returned Mail) (mas)
December 19, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION for Appointed Lawyer by Plaintiff Susan F. Urell (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (kk2)
December 19, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of SSDI 3.2% Increase in 2024 by Plaintiff Susan F. Urell (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (kk2)
December 19, 2023 Filing 10 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Susan F. Urell (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4) (kk2)
December 12, 2023 Filing 9 EXHIBITS by Plaintiff Susan F. Urell re #5 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Ex 3 Part 1, #2 Ex 3 Part 2, #3 Ex 3 Part 3, #4 Ex 4-6, #5 Ex 7, #6 Ex 8, #7 Ex 9-13, #8 Ex 14-16 Part 1, #9 Ex 16 Part 2, #10 Ex 17 Part 1, #11 Ex 17 Part 2, #12 Ex 18-19, #13 Ex 20-21, #14 Ex 22, #15 Ex 23, #16 Ex 24, #17 Ex 25-31, #18 Ex 32-33 Part 1, #19 Ex 33 Part 2, #20 Ex 33 Part 3, #21 Ex 34-39, #22 Ex 40-41 Part 1, #23 Ex 41 Part 2, #24 Ex 42-43) (mas)
December 12, 2023 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #5 Complaint by Plaintiff Susan F. Urell. (mas)
December 11, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Colgate-Palmolive Company, Thomas L. Dunlap, III, Hecho Studios LLC. (mas)
December 11, 2023 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Marsha Butler, Colgate-Palmolive Company, Thomas L. Dunlap, III, Hecho Studios LLC, filed by Susan F. Urell. (mas)
December 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Susan F. Urell. The November 3, 2023 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. #2 ) is VACATED and Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff MAY PROCEED on her claims for copyright infringement against Defendants The Colgate-Palmolive Company, Hecho Studios LLC, and Thomas L. Dunlap, III, but it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's remaining claim against Marsha Butler be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Objections to R&R due by 12/26/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 12/11/2023. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 11, 2023 This entry is for statistical purposes only. (mas)
November 15, 2023 Filing 3 OBJECTION to #2 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Susan F. Urell (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3) (kk2)
November 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 **VACATED pursuant to #4 Order** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Susan F. Urell. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED and that she be ordered to pay the required $402.00 filing fee within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS if she intends to proceed. Objections to R&R due by 11/17/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 11/3/2023. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified text on 12/12/2023 (mas).
November 2, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Susan F. Urell (Attachments: #1 Complaint and Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Forms, #4 Waivers of Service, #5 USM-285 Marshal Forms) (kk2)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Urell v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan F. Urell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colgate-Palmolive Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marsha Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hecho Studios LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas L. Dunlap, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?