King v. Orange Township et al
Andrew King |
Orange Township, Robert B Grumbles, Ryan Fitzpatrick Rivers and Deborah Suzanne Taranto |
2:2023cv04230 |
December 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Edmund A Sargus |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Robert B Grumbles, Orange Township, Ryan Fitzpatrick Rivers, Deborah Suzanne Taranto. (mas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET and Request for Issuance of Summons filed by Andrew King. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Orange Township, #2 Summons Form Robert B. Grumbles, #3 Summons Form Ryan Fitzpatrick Rivers, #4 Summons Form Deborah Suzanne Taranto) (Tucker, Janica) Modified event and text on 12/27/2023 (mas). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9743048), filed by Andrew King. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Dual Filing Notice, #2 Exhibit 2 - OCRC Notice, #3 Exhibit 3 - Conciliation Agreement & Consent Order, #4 Exhibit 4 - Dismissal of Charge & Notice of Right to Sue, #5 Exhibit 5 - Employment Agreement, #6 Exhibit 6 - Meeting Notice 04-12-21, #7 Exhibit 7 - Meeting Agenda 05-03-21, #8 Exhibit 8 - Special Meeting Notice) (Tucker, Janica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.