Fenstermaker vs Warden Southeastern Correctional Inst.
| Tony Fenstermaker |
| Norm Robinson and Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution |
| 2:2024cv00162 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| James L Graham |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Hilda Rosenberg for Respondent Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution (Rosenberg, Hilda) |
Filing 2
ORDER - Re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tony Fenstermaker. Respondent is ORDERED to file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases WITHIN SIXTY DAYS of the date of filing of this Order. Specifically, said Answer must respond to each of Petitioner's allegations, raise any affirmative defenses, and state whether, from Respondents perspective, any claim in the Petition is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar, nonretroactivity, or a statute of limitations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on January 19, 2024. (jlk)
|
| Set deadlines - Answer due 3/19/2024. (jlk) |
| Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AOHSDC-9767591.), filed by Tony Fenstermaker. (Billing, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
