Tingler v. Ohio General Assembly et al
Plaintiff: Charles L. Tingler
Defendant: Ohio General Assembly and Supreme Court of Ohio
Case Number: 2:2024cv00468
Filed: February 6, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Referring Judge: James L Graham
2 Judge: Michael H Watson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the March 19, 2024 Opinion and Order, Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED, and the R&R is ADOPTED. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 OPINION and ORDER adopting #3 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 3/19/2024. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Case reassigned to Judge Michael H. Watson for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 3/11/24. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendation, by Plaintiff Charles L. Tingler. (vb)
February 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Re #2 Complaint filed by Charles L. Tingler. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED in its entirety. Objections to R&R due by 3/6/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on February 21, 2024. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Ohio General Assembly, Supreme Court of Ohio, filed by Charles L. Tingler. (jlk)
February 21, 2024 Opinion or Order This entry is being created for statistical purposes. (jlk)
February 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Charles L. Tingler. Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 envelope. (vb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tingler v. Ohio General Assembly et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles L. Tingler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ohio General Assembly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Supreme Court of Ohio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?