Siyad v. Jaddou et al
Plaintiff: Hawo Mohamed Siyad
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, William Bent and Antony Blinken
Case Number: 2:2024cv00692
Filed: February 19, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Referring Judge: Algenon L Marbley
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendants William Bent, Antony Blinken, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. William Bent served on 2/28/2024, answer due 4/29/2024; Antony Blinken served on 2/28/2024, answer due 4/29/2024; Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 2/26/2024, answer due 4/26/2024; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 2/26/2024, answer due 4/26/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua)
February 20, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to William Bent, Antony Blinken, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (jlk)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTATION ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Joshua Goldstein as co-counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on February 20, 2024. (jlk)
February 19, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-9824590) of Joshua L. Goldstein by Plaintiff Hawo Mohamed Siyad. (Marks, Seth)
February 19, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against William Bent, Antony Blinken, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, filed by Hawo Mohamed Siyad. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form) (Goldstein, Joshua)
February 19, 2024 Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AOHSDC-9824589. (Marks, Seth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Siyad v. Jaddou et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hawo Mohamed Siyad
Represented By: Seth Benjamin Marks
Represented By: Joshua L. Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Bent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?