Debose v. DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.,

Plaintiff: Rashad Debose
Defendant: DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC., and Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.
Petitioner: City of Columbus and Lara Baker-Morrish
Case Number: 2:2024cv01113
Filed: March 11, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Algenon L Marbley
Referring Judge: Chelsey M Vascura
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2024 Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. (Return to Sender) Mail sent to Benjamin R. Osborn as to #2 Order. (er)
March 15, 2024 Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Withdraw; denying as moot #1 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 3/15/2024. (mas)
March 15, 2024 ***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to #4 Order. (mas)
March 14, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION to Withdraw #1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 52 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9859727) by Movant City of Columbus. (Rabe, Lee Ann)
March 14, 2024 Filing 2 ORDER - It is ORDERED that the default briefing schedule set forth in Local Civil Rule 7.2(a)(2) shall not apply to Movants' Motion (ECF No. #1 .) Any party's memorandum in opposition is due on or before MARCH 20, 2024. Movants shall have until MARCH 22, 2024, to file a reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 3/14/2024. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 14, 2024 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena. Responses due by 3/20/2024 Replies due by 3/22/2024. (mas)
March 11, 2024 Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena ( Filing fee $ 52 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9859727), filed by City of Columbus. (Rabe, Lee Ann)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Debose v. DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rashad Debose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: City of Columbus
Represented By: Lee Ann Rabe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lara Baker-Morrish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?