WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
| Jamal F. Woodley Sr. |
| David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas, Evan Poole, M. CATHERINE KURLIA, FREDERICK BENTON, JR., Toure' McCord, Major Geoffrey Stobart, GUY GRINSTEAD and ANDY CALLIF |
| 2:2024cv01619 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Algenon L Marbley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 6/22/2024. by Petitioner Jamal F. Woodley Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I, #2 Exhibit II, #3 Exhibit III) (jlk) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Petitioner Jamal F. Woodley Sr. (jlk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Affidavit of Insolvency by Plaintiff Jamal F. Woodley Sr. (mas) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Because it appears this action is subject to dismissal for lack of exhaustion and because petitioner's requested relief - dismissal of the charges pending against him - is not properly brought in a pretrial 2241 petition, petitioner is ORDERED to show cause, in writing, within 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice; ORDER denying as moot #2 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Show Cause Response due by 6/3/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/3/2024. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing fee (Habeas Corpus): $ 5.00, receipt number 200006071 (kk2) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:24-cv-00501. Original file electronic copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman added. Motions referred to Stephanie K. Bowman. (er) |
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Southern District of Ohio. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 4/7/2024. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 03/10/2024. (zcb) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 4/8/2024.]
|
| ***Staff notes - The Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed at ECF No. #4 was docketed as received by the clerk's office. The account statement appears to be missing two pages. (zjd) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 4/8/2024.] |
| Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by JAMAL F. WOODLEY SR. (zjd) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 4/8/2024.] |
| Filing 3 CONSENT TO COLLECTION OF FEES FROM TRUST ACCOUNT by JAMAL F. WOODLEY SR. (zjd) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 4/8/2024.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JAMAL F. WOODLEY SR. (zjd) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 4/8/2024.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JAMAL F. WOODLEY SR. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit) (zjd) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 4/8/2024.] |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 2/13/2024. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zjd) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 4/8/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.