King v. Watson
Richard N. King |
Tom Watson |
2:2024cv02365 |
May 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Sarah D Morrison |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Petitioner Richard N. King (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kk2) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Petitioner is hereby ORDERED to show cause, in writing within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, why this action should not be transferred to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals as a successive petition. Petitioner is advised that failure to respond to this Order will result in the case being transferred. Show Cause Response due by 6/19/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on May 20, 2024. (jlk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Ohio Northern; Case Number 3:24-cv-00387. Original file electronic copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Judge Sarah D. Morrison and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers added. (er) |
Filing 3 Order of Transfer: For the reasons stated herein, this action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for all further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan on 5/10/2024. (H,AR) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 5/13/2024.] |
Copy of Order of Transfer (Doc. No. #3 ) mailed to Richard N. King, 489-103, P.O. Box 1812, Marion, OH 43301 and Warden Tom Watson, 670 Marion-Williamsport Rd. E, Marion, OH 44302 on 5/10/2024. (H,AR) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 5/13/2024.] |
Filing 2 Administrative Track DCM Initial Order. Chief Judge Sara Lioi on 3/1/2024. (K,AR) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 5/13/2024.] |
Filing 1 Petition under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a person in state custody. Filing fee paid. 5.00. Receipt # 14233. Filed by Richard N. King. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Supporting Documentation, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Envelope) (K,AR) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 5/13/2024.] |
Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan assigned to case. (K,AR) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 5/13/2024.] |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (K,AR) [Transferred from Ohio Northern on 5/13/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: King v. Watson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Richard N. King | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Tom Watson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.