McCullom v. Newark Police Department et al
| Christopher T. McCullom |
| Sgt. Clint Eskins, Cliff J. Murphy, Licking County Prosecutor's Office, Officer Alex Colles, Doug Wells, Officer Stevens, Officer Ulmer, William Hayes and Newark Police Department |
| 2:2024cv02806 |
| May 22, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Sarah D Morrison |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Supplement to Complaint #1 (signed page of the complaint) by Plaintiff Christopher T. McCullom. (jlk) |
Filing 2
DEFICIENCY ORDER issued re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Plaintiff's tendered complaint. Should Plaintiff wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff is ORDERED to sign the Complaint and return it to the Clerk of Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 6/6/24. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Show Cause Response due by 7/6/2024. (sem) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Christopher T. McCullom. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jlk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
