Mohamed, et al. v. Blinken, et al.
Plaintiff: Nuh Mohamed Adan and Roda Mohamed
Defendant: Antony J. Blinken, Rena Bitter and Gwendolyn Green
Case Number: 2:2024cv03980
Filed: September 26, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K Bowman
Referring Judge: James L Graham
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2024 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Rena Bitter, Antony J. Blinken and Gwendolyn Green (summons were re-issued for Defendants Green and Bitter) (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Bitter, #2 Summons Form Green) (sem) Modified docket text on 10/30/2024 (sem).
October 23, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Rena Bitter, Gwendolyn Green. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form) (ds)
October 23, 2024 Filing 4 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Summons - Rena Bitter, #2 Summons Form Summons - Gwendolyn Green) (Mamari, Joseph)
September 26, 2024 Filing 3 Notice of Deficiency re #2 Pro Hac Vice Motion. Deficiency Deadline by 10/10/2024. (vb) (vb).
September 26, 2024 Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-10181721) of Joseph Mamari by Plaintiffs Nuh Mohamed Adan, Roda Mohamed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Mamari, Joseph) Modified on 9/26/2024 (vb).
September 26, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY REVIEW UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT AND FOR A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Rena Bitter, Antony J. Blinken, Gwendolyn Green ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10181559), filed by Roda Mohamed, Nuh Mohamed Adan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Mamari, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mohamed, et al. v. Blinken, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony J. Blinken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rena Bitter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gwendolyn Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nuh Mohamed Adan
Represented By: Joseph Zayan Mamari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roda Mohamed
Represented By: Joseph Zayan Mamari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?