Habtemariam-Brown v. Christensen et al
| Saba Habtemariam-Brown |
| Amanda Burgess, Michael Christensen, Laura Plank, John Doe, Tortfeasors 1-2, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Jeff Klyeswer, Mohamed Roble, Jeff Krusesner, Nationwide Insurance Company, Kevine Popham and David Orlandini |
| 2:2024cv04052 |
| October 10, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Algenon L Marbley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections to Report and Recommendations. Objections due by 12/30/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on December 2, 2024. (jlk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time, until 12/30/24, to Respond to #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION filed by Plaintiff Saba Habtemariam-Brown. (sem) |
|
Filing 6
Order and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Re #5 Amended Complaint filed by Phillip Brown, Saba Habtemariam-Brown. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's federal claims be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims and that these state law claims be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Finally, the Clerk is DIRECTED to correct the docket to reflect that Phillip Brown is not a named Plaintiff in this matter. Objections to R&R due by 11/29/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on November 14, 2024. (jlk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Phillip Brown, Saba Habtemariam-Brown. (jlk) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants, filed by Phillip Brown, Saba Habtemariam-Brown. (jlk) |
|
ORDER (See ECF #6 for Order) - granting as amended #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on November 14, 2024. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Saba Habtemariam-Brown. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (mve) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER - Re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Saba Habtemariam-Brown. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER another application to proceed in forma pauperis. In it, she should provide the required information, and, if necessary, explain how she is able to live with no income or expenses. Deficiency Deadline by 11/14/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on October 15, 2024. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Saba Habtemariam-Brown and Phillip Brown. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 USM, #4 Summons Form) (jlk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
