B.W. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
B. W. |
Red Roof Franchising, LLC and Red Roof Inns, Inc. |
2:2024cv04058 |
October 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Algenon L Marbley |
Other Statutory Actions |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Red Roof Franchising, LLC on 10/15/2024, answer due 12/16/2024. (Barrick, Penny) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Red Roof Inns, Inc. on 10/15/2024, answer due 12/16/2024. (Barrick, Penny) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Judges agree that the following cases ARE related: 2:19-cv-755 and 2:24-cv-4058. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Algenon L Marbley on October 16, 2024. (jlk) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Red Roof Franchising, LLC, Red Roof Inns, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form) (jlk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Red Roof Franchising, LLC, Red Roof Inns, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10205840), filed by B. W.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form as to Red Roof Inns, Inc., #3 Summons Form as to Red Roof Franchising, LLC) (Barrick, Penny) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.