Lovett v. Evans et al
Kelvin R. Lovett |
C/O Buckler, Capt. Yates, Sgt Mayes, Lt Williams, C/O Scott, Warden W Cool, Unit Manager Evans, C.M. J Ware and Capt. Crabtree |
2:2024cv04081 |
October 18, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Stephanie K Bowman |
James L Graham |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Civil Filing fee received: $405, receipt number 200007999. (mas) |
![]() |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Kelvin R. Lovett. (vb) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, by Plaintiff Kelvin R. Lovett. (vb) |
Filing 4 Notice of Deficiency: The Court's docket reflects the initiation of the above referenced civil action. The initiating material contains the following deficiency(ies):Filing Fee Missing. The materials do not include the filing fee ($405) or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (provided). (mve)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Attachments: #1 Envelopes) (mve) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Kelvin R. Lovett. (Attachments: #1 Envelopes) (mve) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants, filed by Kelvin R. Lovett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (mve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.