Pampley v. Cuyahoga County Jail et al
| High Priest Aaron Lewis Pampley |
| Cuyahoga County Jail and Michelle Henry |
| 2:2025cv00056 |
| January 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Sarah D Morrison |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER - The Clerk of Courts is hereby DIRECTED TO TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, for ruling on Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 1/24/2025. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Case transferred to the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (km) |
| ***Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO as case 1:25-cv-00130, filed 01/24/2025. (er) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Aaron Lewis Pampley (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Forms, #4 USM-285 Forms, #5 Envelope) (kk2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
