King v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Roger King
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 2:2026cv00185
Filed: February 16, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Stephanie K Bowman
Referring Judge: Algenon L Marbley
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2026 Filing 10 Response in Opposition re #9 Statement of Specific Errors by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Reply to Opposition to Statement of Errors due by 7/7/2026. (Murphy, Kevin)
May 26, 2026 Filing 9 STATEMENT OF SPECIFIC ERRORS by Plaintiff Roger King Opposition to Statement of Errors due by 7/10/2026. (Farrell, Clifford)
April 9, 2026 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Bradley Murphy for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Murphy, Kevin)
April 8, 2026 Filing 7 First CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 5/26/2026. (Stark, John)
February 19, 2026 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, there is no unanimous consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to randomly assign this case to a resident District Judge. (jmb)
February 19, 2026 District Judge Algenon L. Marbley and Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman added. (jmb)
February 17, 2026 Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Roger King. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (km)
February 17, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. In accordance with Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 8.1, the Commissioner shall file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record within 60 DAYS after filing of the Social Security Identification Form and the Complaint as required by Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 8.1(a), which copy shall function as the Answer. Plaintiff must file a Statement of Errors within 45 DAYS after filing of the administrative record setting forth the bases upon which reversal or remand is sought. The Commissioner must file and serve a Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Statement of Errors within 45 DAYS after service of the Statement of Errors. Plaintiff's Reply, if any, must be filed 15 DAYS after the memorandum in opposition is filed. All briefing must include references to the administrative record. All briefing must include references to the administrative record in the following citation format to the Bates-stamped number in the lower-right hand corner of the page: "(R. at ____.)". All documents filed electronically must be filed in optical character recognition ("OCR") text-searchable PDF format. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 2/17/2026. (km)
February 17, 2026 Filing 4 Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Jurisdiction Form shall be completed and emailed to the Court's Social Security Case Coordinator at, [email protected] or mailed to: Office of the ClerkWalter H. Rice Federal Buildingand U.S. CourthouseRoom 712Attn: Social Security Coordinator200 W. Second StreetDayton, Ohio 45402DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS DOCUMENT, IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS OR EMAILED TO [email protected]. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form due by 3/19/2026 (jmb)
February 17, 2026 Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE and GENERAL ORDER 22-04: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, if no party indicates that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment. Further, the filing of a party's statement of errors or memorandum in opposition without first filing an executed copy of the Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form will also be deemed as consent by that party to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over all aspects of the litigation, including entry of a final judgment. (jmb)
February 17, 2026 Set/Reset Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 4/20/2026. (km)
February 16, 2026 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Roger King. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint) (Farrell, Clifford)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger King
Represented By: Clifford Michael Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John J. Stark
Represented By: Kevin Bradley Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?