Taylor v. Ohio Department of Development
| Monti Taylor |
| Ohio Department of Development |
| 2:2026cv00219 |
| February 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| S Courter Shimeall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER - The Court hereby RESCHEDULES the telephonic preliminary pretrial conference to May 7, 2026, at 10 AM. The parties are directed to call 1-551-285-1373, and enter Zoom Meeting ID 161-603-4081#. The Participant ID and Meeting Passcode are both 581746#. Signed by Magistrate Judge S. Courter Shimeall on April 22, 2026. (jlk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTATION ORDER issued in that the parties filed a Rule 26(f) report #14 and indicated that the Rule 16 preliminary pretrial conference set for April 23, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. is not needed. Upon review, however, the Court finds that this action will benefit from the conference and DENIES the parties' request to vacate the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge S. Courter Shimeall on 4/20/26. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 16 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Monti Taylor as to re #13 Notice of Hearing. (Attachments: #1 Content in Envelope) (bew) |
| Filing 14 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Defendant Ohio Department of Development. (Lippman, Allison) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 4/23/2026 10:00 AM in Zoom Meeting before Magistrate Judge S. Courter Shimeall. (wam)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint filed by Ohio Department of Development. (Lippman, Allison) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge S. Courter Shimeall for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief District Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 3/17/26. (sem)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Devon J. Alexander for Defendant Ohio Department of Development (Alexander, Devon) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Allison Jennifer Lippman for Defendant Ohio Department of Development (Lippman, Allison) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties are notified that if all parties consent, a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form may be accessed at the following link: #AO-085. The consent form should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent form unless all parties have signed the consent. (kaw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Ohio Department of Development. Ohio Department of Development served on 2/27/2026, answer due 3/20/2026. (bew) |
| Filing 7 First Amended Complaint for Retaliation against Ohio Department of Development, filed by Monti Taylor. (sem) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ohio Attorney General served on 3/4/2026, answer due 3/25/2026. (bew) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the Summons and Complaint was sent by certified mail to Ohio Department of Development c/o Ohio Attorney General (9589 0710 5270 3512 5428 36). (bew) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ohio Department of Development c/o Ohio Attorney General. (bew) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: A copy of the Summons and Complaint was sent by certified mail to Ohio Department of Development (9589 0710 5270 3512 5428 36). (bew) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ohio Department of Development. (bew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Ohio Department of Development, filed by Monti Taylor. (kaw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/23/2026: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (kaw). |
| Filing fee received: $ 405, receipt number 200011157. (kaw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Ohio Department of Development | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Monti Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ohio Department of Development | |
| Represented By: | Devon J. Alexander |
| Represented By: | Allison Jennifer Lippman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
