Tully v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sophia Tully
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 2:2026cv00331
Filed: March 18, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: S Courter Shimeall
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2026 Filing 8 First CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Defendant Statement of Errors due by 6/29/2026. (Attachments: #1 002 Original 26-00331 merged_chunk, #2 003 Original 26-00331 merged_chunk, #3 004 Original 26-00331 merged_chunk) (Stark, John)
April 20, 2026 CLERK'S NOTICE: As no party has indicated on the previously issued #4 Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment pursuant to General Order 22-04. (jmb)
March 19, 2026 Filing 7 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Sophia Tully. (jmb)
March 19, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. In accordance with the Southern District of Ohio Civil Rule 8.1, the Commissioner shall file and serve a certified copy of the administrative record within sixty (60) days after filing of the Social Security Identification Form, which copy shall function as the Answer. Plaintiff must file a Statement of Errors within forty-five (45) days after filing of the administrative record setting forth the bases upon which reversal or remand is sought. The Commissioner must file and serve a Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Statement of Errors within forty-five (45) days after service of the Statement of Errors. Plaintiff's Reply, if any, must be filed fifteen (15) days after the memorandum in opposition is filed. All briefing must include references to the administrative record. All documents filed electronically must be filed in optical character recognition (OCR) text-searchable PDF format. Signed by Magistrate Judge S. Courter Shimeall on 03/19/2026. (jmb)
March 19, 2026 Set/Reset Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security shall file the electronic certified administrative record and answer or respond to the Complaint by 5/18/2026. (jmb)
March 18, 2026 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-10945134) of David Chermol by Plaintiff Sophia Tully. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Farrell, Clifford)
March 18, 2026 Filing 4 Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Jurisdiction Form shall be completed and emailed to the Court's Social Security Case Coordinator at, [email protected] or mailed to: Office of the ClerkWalter H. Rice Federal Buildingand U.S. CourthouseRoom 712Attn: Social Security Coordinator200 W. Second StreetDayton, Ohio 45402DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS DOCUMENT, IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS OR EMAILED TO [email protected]. The completed Statement As To Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form due by 4/17/2026 (jmb)
March 18, 2026 Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE and GENERAL ORDER 22-04: Pursuant to #S.D. Ohio General Order 22-04, if no party indicates that they are withholding their consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the case will remain with the assigned Magistrate Judge for all matters, including entry of a final judgment. Further, the filing of a party's statement of errors or memorandum in opposition without first filing an executed copy of the Statement as to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form will also be deemed as consent by that party to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over all aspects of the litigation, including entry of a final judgment. (jmb)
March 18, 2026 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Sophia Tully. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint) (Farrell, Clifford)
March 18, 2026 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David Chermol as Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge S. Courter Shimeall on 03/18/2026. (jmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tully v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sophia Tully
Represented By: David F Chermol
Represented By: Clifford Michael Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John J. Stark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?