Stringer v. King et al
Plaintiff: Vickie M. Stringer
Defendant: Michelle King and Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2026cv00428
Filed: April 9, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Kimberly A Jolson
Referring Judge: Michael H Watson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Vickie M. Stringer (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kaw)
April 14, 2026 Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Vickie M. Stringer against Michelle King & Social Security Administration. (er)
April 14, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file the completed USM-285 forms, completed summons forms, and the service copies of her Complaint by April 24, 2026. Following successful completion of these tasks, the Court will direct service on Defendants. Plaintiff is WARNED that failure to timely comply with this Order may result in a recommendation that her case be dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 4/14/2026. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
April 9, 2026 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Vickie M. Stringer. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 USM Form) (kaw)
April 9, 2026 CLERK'S NOTICE: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties are notified that if all parties consent, a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form may be accessed at the following link: #AO-085. The consent form should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent form unless all parties have signed the consent. (kaw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stringer v. King et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vickie M. Stringer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?