Williams v. The Ohio State University Moms2B Program et al
| Jason Lemarr Williams |
| The Ohio State University Moms2B Program and Medical Director Kami Dixon |
| 2:2026cv00431 |
| April 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Sarah D Morrison |
| S Courter Shimeall |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Medical Director Kami Dixon & The Ohio State University Moms2B Program, filed by Jason Lemarr Williams. (vb) |
Filing 12
ORDER Finding Moot #9 Motion to Dismiss. Granting #10 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Denying without prejudice #11 Motion for Extension of Time to perfect service. Signed by Magistrate Judge S. Courter Shimeall on 5/18/2026. (vb) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedural 12(b)(2), (4), and (5), or in the alternative, Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Plaintiff Jason Lemarr Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (bew) Modified on 5/18/2026 (vb). |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Jason Lemarr Williams. (Attachments: #1 First Amended Complaint, #2 Envelope) (bew) |
| Filing 9 FINDING MOOT per order ECF No #12 *** MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedural 12(b)(2), (4), and (5), or in the alternative, Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) by Defendants Kami Dixon, The Ohio State University Moms2B Program. (Slater, Cathleen) Modified on 5/18/2026 (vb). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Defendants Kami Dixon, The Ohio State University Moms2B Program of Special and Limited Appearance of Counsel (Benson, Tyler) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Defendants Kami Dixon, The Ohio State University Moms2B Program of Special and Limited Appearance of Counsel (Slater, Cathleen) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed: Kami Dixon and The Ohio State University Moms2B Program served on 4/20/2026, answers due 5/11/2026 (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt Return Dixon, #2 Certified Mail Receipt Return OSU) (kk2) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Denying Moot ECF #4 . The Clerk already issued service upon the Defendants by certified mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge S. Courter Shimeall on 4/20/2026. (vb) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 4 DENIED AS MOOT per Order ECF No #5 *** MOTION for Service by Plaintiff Jason Lemarr Williams. (kaw) Modified on 4/20/2026 (vb). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kami Dixon and The Ohio State University Moms2B Program. (kaw) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk. A copy of the complaint and issued summons were sent to the following Defendants via certified mail service: Dr. Kami Dixon (7009 2820 0003 5799 0306) and The Ohio State University MOMS2BProgram (7009 2820 0003 5799 0290). (kaw) |
| Filing fee received: $ 405, receipt number 200011533. (kaw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Kami Dixon, The Ohio State University Moms2B Program filed by Jason Lemarr Williams (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (kk2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
