Latham II v. SCOUTLOGIC, INC.
| George McKinley Latham II |
| SCOUTLOGIC, INC. |
| 2:2026cv00570 |
| May 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (er) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff George McKinley Latham II (Malka, Atid) |
Filing 7
ORDER issued in that the parties are ORDERED to file a joint written REPORT detailing the status of this case ON OR BEFORE JULY 20, 2026, unless they have filed a dismissal entry in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) in the interim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 6/5/26. (sem)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement as to Defendant ScoutLogic, Inc. by Plaintiff George McKinley Latham II (Malka, Atid) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to SCOUTLOGIC, INC. on 5/20/2026, answer due 7/20/2026. (Malka, Atid) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties are notified that if all parties consent, a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form may be accessed at the following link: #AO-085. The consent form should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent form unless all parties have signed the consent. (sem) |
|
Filing 4
NOTATION ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Atid Malka. PHV counsel are directed to register for e-filing through PACER if they have not already done so. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 5/13/26. (sem)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SCOUTLOGIC, INC. (ds) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-11035891) of Atid Malka by Plaintiff George McKinley Latham II. (Zukowsky, Amichai) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against SCOUTLOGIC, INC. ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-11034992), filed by George McKinley Latham II. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form) (Zukowsky, Amichai) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Latham II v. SCOUTLOGIC, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: George McKinley Latham II | |
| Represented By: | Atid Malka |
| Represented By: | Amichai Eitan Zukowsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SCOUTLOGIC, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
