Brooks v. Just Pies, Inc. et al
| Dinese Brooks |
| Just Pies, Inc. and Peter Sterk |
| 2:2026cv00807 |
| July 7, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Sarah D Morrison |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Just Pies, Inc. (kk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-11119369), filed by Dinese Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form) (Filippelli, Paul) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73 and 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties are notified that if all parties consent, a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form may be accessed at the following link: #AO-085. The consent form should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent form unless all parties have signed the consent. (kk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
