Stepp, et al v. Monsanto Research, et al
| James Stepp, Theresa Stepp, Melvin Adams, Katherine Adams, Elmer Bailey, Elma Bailey, Crystal Burns, Rick Cowdrey, Sharon Cowdrey, Richard Cowdrey, Rick Francis, Theresa Francis, Russell Flowers, Mary Flowers, Roy Havens, Janet Havens, Daniel Land, Tami Land, John Rawlins, Marilyn Rawlins, Kim Recker, Freda Reedy, Howard Serio, Allen Shoemaker, Paul Sizemore, Sharon Sizemore, Diana Tragesser, Larry Turner, Judith Turner, Dale Vaughn, Brenda Vaughn, Daniel Wilkins, Daray Wilkins and Sandra Woodard |
| Monsanto Research Corporation and EG&G Mound Applied Technologies, Inc |
| 3:1991cv00468 |
| December 5, 1991 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Walter H Rice |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
420
AMENDED ORDER - Therefore, the Court hereby AMENDS THE AUGUST 29, 2012 ORDER (doc. 419 ) AS FOLLOWS: (1) The name Richard Derringer, listed on Page 6 of the Courts Order (PageID 2838), shall be deleted; (2) The name Victor Reynolds shall be substitu ted in its place; (3) Plaintiffs counsel is ORDERED to return to Fifth Third Bank the check made payable to Richard Derringer;(4) Fifth Third Bank, within ten business days after receipt from Plaintiffs counsel the check originally made payable to Ri chard Derringer, is ORDERED to issue a check payable to Victor Reynolds the sum of $451.64. After issuing the check payable to Mr. Reynolds, Fifth Third Bank shall promptly send the check toPlaintiffs counsel, who is handling the distribution of all checks issued pursuant to the Courts August 29, 2012 Order; and (5) But for the deletion of the name Richard Derringer and substitution of claimant Victor Reynolds (doc. 419 , at Page ID 2838) as Ordered above, the remainder of the Courts August 29, 2012 Order (doc. 419 ) is unchanged by this Order.Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 09/04/2012. (kf)
|
|
Filing
419
FINAL ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 08/29/2012. (kf)
|
|
Filing
401
ORDER - In order to receive payment as a claimant under the terms of the settlement agreement reached in this action, you must sign and date a GENERAL RELEASE, and deliver it in person or by mail to the U.S. District Court Clerks Office by WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2012.Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 07/27/2012. (kf)
|
|
Filing
361
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 05/16/2012. (kf)
|
|
Filing
199
ORDER - It is hereby ordered that the above captioned cause be administrativelyprocessed. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 03/06/2012. (kf) AO Processing/"Case Settled. Rule 23e hearing set for 5/16/2012 at 3:30 pm."
|
|
Filing
198
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS (DOC. 184 ) CERTIFIED CLASS REDEFINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRIOR RULINGS OF THIS COURT; CONFERENCE CALL SET FOR MARCH 5, 2012 AT 5:00 P.M. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/21/12. (cib1)
|
|
Filing
196
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL (DOC. # 188 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC. # 189 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SET ASIDE SCHEDULING ORDER, STAY DISCOVERY AND CONVENE A STATUS CONFERENCE (DOC. # 190 ). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/1/2012. (mdf1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
