Responsible Environmental Solutions Alliance v. Waste Management Inc et al
Case Number: 3:2004cv00013
Filed: January 16, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 267 AMENDED DECISION AND ENTRY (TO REFLECT SETTLEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES) SUSTAINING AMENDED JOINT MOTION OF PLAINTIFF AND SETTLING DEFENDANTS TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT (DOC. 246 ); OPINION ALLOCATING EQUITABLE SHARES BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.; DEFENDANTS COLOR PAC, INC., AND RIVERWOOD INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ORDERED TERMINATED AS PARTIES DEFENDANT; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/3/2011. (kje1)
October 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 265 ORDER granting 264 Joint Motion Under Rule 60(B) by Plaintiff Responsible Environmental Solutions Alliance, Defendant Waste Management Inc. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 10/21/2010. (kje1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Responsible Environmental Solutions Alliance v. Waste Management Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?