Flores v. USA
||January 17, 2006
||US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
||Sharon L Ovington
||Walter H Rice
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
|Cause of Action:
||28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 2, 2007
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. #239) OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; DEFENDANT-PETITIONER'S PRO SE "OBJECTION TO JUDGMENT, NOTICE OF DUE PROCESS VIOLATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER TO DELIVER MAGIST RATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS WITH A NEW 10-DAY PERIOD TO RESPOND TO SAME." CONSTRUED AS A TIMELY FILED MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.59(e) (Doc. #237), SUSTAINED; FINAL JUDGMENT OF FEBRUARY 17, 2006, VACATED; CAPTIONED CAUSE RE-OPENED ON THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT; DIRECTION TO CLERK OF COURTS OFFICE; DEFENDANT-PETITIONER'S MOTION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Doc. #251) AND OBJECTIONS (Doc. #255) TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF SAID REQUEST (Doc. #253) OVERRULED AS MOOT AT THIS. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 3/2/2007. (sc1, ) Modified on 3/2/2007 to edit doucment number (sc1, ).
|January 20, 2006
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to Margarito Flores - It is THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence 233 be dismissed; That a certificate of appealibility not issue; and The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 2/3/2006. Signed by Judge Sharon L Ovington on 01/20/06. (phil1, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?