Hawk et al v. NCR Corporation
Case Number: 3:2006cv00301
Filed: September 28, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER - It is hereby ordered that the above captioned cause be administratively processed. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 3/30/2011. (kje1) (AOProcessing/"Case settled Fairness Hearing held 3/24/2011. Final paperwork due week of April 4, 2011.") Modified on 3/30/2011 to include text (kje1).
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 63 DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES (Doc. 56 ), WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL AT CONCLUSION OF APPELLATE PROCESS, SHOULD THIS COURT'S JUDGMENT BE AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/27/2010. (kje1)
August 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 55 JUDGMENT in favor of Lenzie Hawk, Linda Ann Metzler, Ruth Render, Steve Stefan against NCR Corporation. Notice of Disposal attached. Signed on 8/27/2009. (sc1, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hawk et al v. NCR Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?