Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Tina Thomas
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2007cv00167
Filed:	May 3, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Sharon L Ovington
Presiding Judge:	Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 15, 2012	Filing 24 DECISION AND ENTRY for 19 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Tina Thomas, 23 Report and Recommendations, - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on May 23, 2012 (Doc. # 23 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plai ntiff's Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Justice Act (Doc. # 19 ) is GRANTED in part to the extent Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA award in the total amount of $3,836. 78~ and, 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 06/15/12. (pb1)
May 23, 2012	Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Justice Act (Doc. 19 ) is GRANTED in part to the extent Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA award in the total amount of $3,836.78; and 2. The case remain terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 6/11/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 5/23/12. (kje1)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 15, 2012

Filing 24 DECISION AND ENTRY for 19 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Tina Thomas, 23 Report and Recommendations, - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on May 23, 2012 (Doc. # 23 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plai ntiff's Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Justice Act (Doc. # 19 ) is GRANTED in part to the extent Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA award in the total amount of $3,836. 78~ and, 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 06/15/12. (pb1)

May 23, 2012

Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Justice Act (Doc. 19 ) is GRANTED in part to the extent Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA award in the total amount of $3,836.78; and 2. The case remain terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 6/11/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 5/23/12. (kje1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Thomas
Represented By:	Gary Marc Blumenthal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	John J Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?