Svete v. Cherneskey Heyman & Kress, P.L.L et al
| David W Svete |
| Cherneskey Heyman & Kress, P.L.L, Richard A Broock, Frederick J Caspar, Richard J Chernesky, Ralph E Heyman, Edward M Kress, William J Leibold, Steven R Watts, Thomas P Whelley, II, Karen R Adams, Christopher M Brown, Anthony E Bruzzese, Todd E Bryant, Andrew K Cherney, Thomas L Czechowski, Bradley W Evers, Mark S Feuer, Gail Littlejohn, James R Mitchell, Lisa S Pierce, Rachael L Rodman, J David Ruffner, Kevin V Simon, Susan D Solle, Donna S Tweel, David R Wickham, Philip A Zukowsky, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 3:2007cv00197 |
| May 21, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'SEMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY AND/OR CONTINUANCE (DOC.# 85 ). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 01/30/13. (pb1)(Svete)
|
|
Filing
83
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FILED DECEMBER 16, 2009 (DOC. # 69 ), THIS COURT NOTING THAT NO OBJECTIONS THERETO HAVE BEEN FILED; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF HEREIN; DIRECTIVE TO CLERK OF COURT'S OFFICE; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 09/26/11. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
70
DECISION AND ENTRY - It is therefore ORDERED that:1.The Report and Recommendations filed on November 24, 2009 69 is ADOPTED in full; 2. Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment 54 is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel 62 and Plaintiffs Pro Se Motion For Continuance Pursuant To Rule 56(f) 65 are DENIED; 4. Plaintiffs Motion For Ruling On Two Motions Pending Before The Court 60 is DENIED as moot; 5. Plaintiff's Motion For The Court To Direct United States Marshals To Serve Remaining Unserved Defendants 61 is DENIED as moot; and 6. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 12/16/2009. (jwd1)
|
|
Filing
69
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. 54 ) be GRANTED; 2. Svete's Motion to Compel (Doc. 62 ) and Svete's Pro Se Motion For Continuance Pursuant To Rule 56(f) (Doc. 65 ) be DENIED; 3. Svete's Motion For Ruling On Two Motions Pending Before The Court (Doc. 60 ) be DENIED as moot; 4. Svete's Motion For The Court To Direct United States Marshals To Serve Remaining Unserved Defendants (Doc. 61 ) be DENIED as moot; and 5. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 12/14/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 11/24/09. (cib1)
|
|
Filing
8
DECISION AND ENTRY REJECTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 4 ) AND SUSTAINING PETITIONERS OBJECTIONS (DOC. 7 ) THERETO; CAPTIONED CAUSE RECOMMITTED. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/4/2008. (sc1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
