Royster v. Pacific Creditors Association et al
Leanora M Royster |
Pacific Creditors Association, Experian, Equifax Inc and Does 1-20 |
3:2008cv00009 |
January 14, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
MONTGOMERY |
Sharon L Ovington |
Walter H Rice |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON DECEMBER 21, 2009 60 GRANTING JEFFREY C. TURNER, ESQ'S, BOYD W. GENTRY, ESQ'S AND CHRISTOPHER T. HERMAN, ESQ.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR D EFENDANT PACIFIC CREDITORS ASSOCIATION 58 ; DENYING DEFENDANT PACIFIC CREDITORS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT 45 ; TERMINATING THIS REOPENED MATTER ON THE DOCKET OF THE COURT. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 1/12/2010. (jwd1) |
Filing 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT THEREFORE IS RECOMMENDED that:1) Jeffrey C. Turner, Esq.s, Boyd W. Gentry, Esq.s and Christopher T. Herman, Esq.s Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant Pacific Creditors Association 58 be GRANTED; 2) Defendant Pacifics Motion for Relief from Judgment 45 be DENIED; and 3) this reopened matter be TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 1/7/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 12/21/2009. (jwd1) Modified on 12/22/2009 to edit text (cib1). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.