United States of America for the use and benefit of Rieck Group, LLC et al v. Monarch Construction Company et al
| United States ex rel and Rieck Group, LLC |
| Monarch Construction Company and Federal Insurance Company |
| 3:2008cv00172 |
| May 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Miller Act Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 40:270 Miller Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
OPINION SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 27 ); OPINION OVERRULING DEFENDANTS' CROSS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 30 ); OPINION SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULI NG IN PART DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS (DOC. 46 ) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 45 ); SAID JUDICIAL FILING ADOPTED IN PART AND REJECTED IN PART; THIS OPINION IS NOT A FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/30/2009. (sc1, )
|
|
Filing
45
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Plaintiff Rieck Group's Motion For Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 27 ) be GRANTED; and 2. Defendants' Cross Motion For Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 30 ) be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 8/10/2009. (sc1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
