Riches v. Tellem et al
| Jonathan Lee Riches |
| Arn Tellem and Bureau of Prisons |
| 3:2008cv00235 |
| July 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Michael R Merz |
| Thomas M Rose |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jonathan Lee Riches, - This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioners Notice of Appeal. An unsuccessful habeas corpus petitioner cannot appeal without a certi ficate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. §2253 Petitioner should be denied a certificate for the following reasons: 1. The Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction over this appeal as the Notice was filed May 21, 2012, more than three years after judgmen t. 2. Petitioner never objected to the Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 2 ) which recommended dismissal of this case for failure to state a claim upon which habeas corpus relief could be granted and for suit against a non-custodian. He is ther efore precluded from raising any issues on appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 14 (1985). 3. Petitioner has neither paid the appellate filing fee nor requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 6/8/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 05/22/12. (pb1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
