Hughes v. Goodrich Corporation et al
| Amy Lynn Hughes |
| Goodrich Corporation and Tobias A. Osner |
| 3:2008cv00263 |
| July 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| MIAMI |
| Walter H Rice |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING OSNER'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TAKE THE PERPETUATION OF TESTIMONY DEPOSITION OF DEAN DAVIS (Doc. 48 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING GOODRICH'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF ROBERT GAYLOR, M.D. (Doc. 53 ); CONFERENCE CALL SET. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/27/2010. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
103
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY DEFENDANT TOBIAS OSNER (DOC. 31 ; DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING INPART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY DEFENDANT GOODRICH CORPORATION (DOC. 33 ); DECISIO N AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION IN LIMINE FILED BY DEFENDANT TOBIASOSNER TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF HIS CONSENSUAL DATING (DOC. 46 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL, DEFENDANT GOODRICH'S MOTION TOSTRIKE JUDY KNOOP, DR. MA RK CORCORAN AND MICHELLE BADGETT JACKSON FROM PLAINTIFF'S WITNESS LIST (DOC. 54 ); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, IN PART MOTION IN LIMINE FILED BY DEFENDANT GOODRICH CORPORATION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE REL ATED TO STATE AGENCY'S FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS (DOC. 55 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING MOTION IN LIMINEFILED BY DEFENDANT GOODRICH CORPORATION TO EXCLUDE REFERENCE TO PLAINTIFF'S RESIGNATION AS A TERMINATION OR CONSTRUCTIVE DISCHARGE (DOC. 57 ); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT TOBIAS OSNER TO JOIN IN CERTAIN MOTIONS IN LIMINE FILED BY DEFENDANT GOODRICH CORPORATION (DOC. 61 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN EXHIBITS (DOC. 62 ); DECISION AND ENTRY DECLARING MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING REGARDING DEFENDANTS' RULE 412MOTIONS (DOC. 68 ). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/21/2010. (kje1)
|
|
Filing
27
DECISION AND ORDER - This case is before the Court on Defendant Goodrich Corporation's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's expert witness designation or, in the alternative, establish new deadlines (Doc. No. 23). Rather than attempt to parse the close distinctions between treating physician testimony about facts learned and opinions formed during treatment and opinions formed outside of treatment, the Court adopts the alternative suggested by Defendant and accepted by Plaintiff: Plaintiff sh all provide expert reports conforming to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and this Court's Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order not later than June 10, 2009. Defendant shall designate rebuttal experts and provide reports not later than July 10, 2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/15/2009. (kopf1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
