Jones v. Neenah Paper, LLC
Plaintiff: Luther Jones
Defendant: Neenah Paper, LLC
Case Number: 3:2008cv00358
Filed: September 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: CHAMPAIGN
Presiding Judge: Michael R Merz
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 55 DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ORDER FIXING AMOUNT AND DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS PURSUANT TO COURT'S ORDER AWARDING SAME (DOC. # 45 ); JUDGMENT TO ENTER ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 8/31/11. (mdf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Neenah Paper, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luther Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neenah Paper, LLC
Represented By: Philip R Wiese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?