Ealy v. Danish et al
Larry E Ealy |
John Danish, Patrick Bonfield, Dave Vore, Dennis Langer and Steven A Yarborough |
3:2008cv00386 |
August 18, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
MONTGOMERY |
Sharon L Ovington |
Walter H Rice |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 39 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, Defendants Judges Yarborough and Langer's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14), Defendants Montgomery County Sheriff, Dave Vore, an d the Montgomery County Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 15), and Defendants Bonfield and Danish's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and memorandum in opposition (Doc. 23) are GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motions fo r Change of Venue (Doc. 32, 36 and 37) are DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Petition (Doc. 27 ) is DENIED; The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this Order will not be taken in good faith and therefore DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. If so certified, Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, will remain free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. (scot1, ) |
Filing 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Defendants Judges Yarborough and Langers Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 14 ), Defendants Montgomery County Sheriff Dave Vore and the Montgomery County Commissioners Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. #15), Defendants Bonfield and Danishs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Opposition (Doc. # 23 ) be GRANTED; 2. Plaintiffs Motions For Change Of Venue (Doc. #s 32 , 36 , 37 ) be DENIED;3. Plaintiffs Motion To A mend Petition (Doc. # 27 ) be DENIED; 4. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. If so certified, Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, would remain free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800,803 (6th Cir. 1999); and 5. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 7/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 07/01/09. (phil1, ) |
Filing 29 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 25 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING, CONSTRUED AS TIMELY FILED (DOC. 26 ), OVERRULED; PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FO R TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DOC. 2 ) OVERRULED; REQUEST FOR THREE-JUDGE PANEL TO HEAR ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THE RESTRAINING ORDER(DOC. 26 ) OVERRULED; PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO AMEND PETITION REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 1/30/09. (cib1) |
Filing 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is Therefore Recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. # 2 ) be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 1/6/09. (cib1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.