Buckhorn Inc v. Orbis Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Buckhorn Inc
Defendant: Orbis Corporation, Orbis Material Handling Inc and Does 1-6
Case Number: 3:2008cv00459
Filed: December 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: CHAMPAIGN
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 351 ORDER TO CLERK OF COURT TO COMPLETE SERVICE VIA DELIVERY TO UNITED STATES MARSHAL re 349 , 350 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 09/03/14. (pb1)(USM 9/3/2014)
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 335 ORDER re 332 Answer to Writ of Garnishment, 318 Notice (Other) filed by Orbis Corporation - JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is ORDERED to deposit funds in its hands in the amount of $122,903.41 to the Clerk of this Court. Upon deposit of s uch funds, the Clerk is ORDERED to cause such funds in the amount of $122,903.41 to be paid to the judgment creditor Orbis Corporation by sending a check payable to Orbis Corporation via regular U.S. Mail to: John Lomas, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, 1900 K. Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20006. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 8/13/2014. (ead1)
July 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 312 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ORBIS'S MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES (Doc. 304). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/11/2014. (mr1)
December 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 291 ORDER DENYING BUCKHORN'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 282 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/30/2013. (mr1)
February 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 254 CLERK'S JUDGMENT AFFIRMING 253 ORDER. (mr1)
February 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 238 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STAY (Doc. 237 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/3/12. (mr1)
September 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 204 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO MODIFY DESIGNATIONS OF DEFENDANTS' DISCOVERY (Doc. 108). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/16/11. (mr1)
September 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 200 ORDER - In direct contravention of the Court's Order, the parties emailed the Court separately. Accordingly, all such emails are STRICKEN. (1) Counsel shall submit a joint email on or before 9/7/11 at 5:00 p.m. with the date of the formal sett lement conference and its participants; and (2) If necessary, Plaintiffs shall file a supplemental memorandum of three pages of less on or before 9/7/11 as to why the motion to modify designations requires a Court ruling prior to the formal settlement conference; and (3) Defendants may file a written response of three pages or less to the supplemental memorandum on or before 9/12/11. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/2/11. (mr1)
November 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER denying 56 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 66 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 11/27/2010. (mrm0)
September 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER REGARDING PENDING DEPOSITIONS: Pursuant to telephone conference held at 11:00 A.M. on Tuesday, September 21, 2010, this case is set for an in-person discovery scheduling conference in Courtroom No. 4, 200 West Second Street, Dayton, Ohio, at 10:00 A.M. on Thursday, September 30, 2010. All counsel who expect to participate in the further litigation of this case are ordered to be present in person. In lieu of this conference, the parties may file, not later than noon, September 29, 2010, a n agreed plan for the depositions that have previously been noticed. Counsel shall forthwith file with this Court copies of all documents filed in other federal district courts relating to discovery issues in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/21/2010. (kpf1)
June 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 DECISION AND ORDER - Plaintiffs' letter request for an informal telephone conference call "regarding Plaintiffs' request for an order compelling the Defendants to produce certain documents responsive to document requests served by the Plaintiffs and to provide Mr. Randall J. Phelps for deposition is DENIED because the Court concludes the discovery dispute(s) are not yet sufficiently formulated to permit resolution in an "informal telephone conference." The parties are ac cordingly ORDERED to file a joint discovery plan setting forth the names of all persons intended to be deposed and proposed dates for completing those depositions. If the parties are unable to agree on a joint plan, they shall file separate proposed plans. These plans shall be filed by July 1, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/4/2010. (kpf1)
February 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' THIRD COUNTERCLAIM (Doc. # 26 ). Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 2/22/10. (bac1)
July 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING ORBIS CORPORATION, ORBIS MATERIAL HANDLING, INC., AND DOES 1 THROUGH 6'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC 12 ) AND GRANTING BUCKHORN, INC.'S IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO JOIN PATENT OWNER (DOC 13 ). Signed by JudgeThomas M Rose on 7/21/09. (bev1, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buckhorn Inc v. Orbis Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Buckhorn Inc
Represented By: Paul Grandinetti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Orbis Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Orbis Material Handling Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-6
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?