Harrison v. Trans Union LLC et al
| Todd Harrison |
| Trans Union LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC, CBE Group, Inc, Financial Recovery Services, Inc., Arrow Financial Services, Bureau of Collection, Midland Credit Management Inc, Plaza Associates, Trilegiant and John Does 1 - 50 |
| 3:2008cv00466 |
| December 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Consumer Credit Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Michael R Merz |
| Walter H Rice |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
STIPULATED ENTRY OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/3/2009. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
79
DISMISSAL ORDER - On Motion of the Plaintiff (Doc. No. 78) and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), it is hereby ordered this case be dismissed with prejudice as against Defendant Arrow Financial Services. In the absence on any signed agreement by Arrow Financial Services, the Court is unable to enter any order enforcing any additional terms of any settlement between Plaintiff and that Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 11/19/2009. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER WITHDRAWING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is accordingly ordered: 1. Plaintiff's Rule 26(A)(1) Initial Disclosures shall be scanned and docketed forthwith; 2. The Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 60) and Supplemental Report and Reco mmendations (Doc. No. 71) are withdrawn. 3. If Plaintiff intends for future filings to make service on Defendants through the Court's electronic filing system, his certificate of service must reflect that fact and could properly read, if true, "I hereby certify I served the foregoing on the Defendants by filing it with the Clerk for scanning." The form of certificate of service which Plaintiff has been using in which he states "I hereby certify that the foregoing was either electronically filed, mailed by regular mail Postal service, and or hand delivered on this ___ day of ___, 2009" is unacceptably confusing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/29/2009. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER - This Fair Credit Reporting Act case is before the Court on Plaintiff Todd Harrison's Objections (Doc. No. 73) to the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 71) recommending for the second time that this case be dismissed without prejudice. In his Objections to the Supplemental Report, Plaintiff now says that he actually filed disclosures and a settlement demand on July 8, 2009. Exhibit B-1 to Doc. No. 73 is a one-page document labeled "Plaint iff Rule 26(A) Initial Disclosures" and bears what appears to be the impression of the Clerk's hand stamp used on copies returned to filers of manually filed documents. The document now attached as Exhibit B-1 to the Objections was not doc keted by the Clerk, although the other three documents were. If Exhibit B-1 is genuine, then the Plaintiff did comply with the Court's Scheduling Order and the Reports and Recommendations should be withdrawn. In order to determine the genuinen ess of Exhibit B-1, the Plaintiff is ORDERED to deliver to Deputy Clerk Phil Butler the original document from which he made Exhibit B-1 not later than October 1, 2009. To avoid further difficulties of this sort, it is further ORDERED: that the Cler k shall, after time-stamping any documents filed by Plaintiff and scanning and docketing them, preserve the timestamped original. Before time-stamping any copies of documents tendered by the Plaintiff, the Clerk shall satisfy himself that every copy so stamped is in fact an exact copy of the original. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/24/2009. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
71
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Because Plaintiff has not proven he complied with the Scheduling Order and because he created false documents attempting to prove he had complied, it is again respectfully recommended that the Complaint herein be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 9/24/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/4/2009. (kopf1, )
|
|
Filing
60
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the Complaint filed by Todd Harrison be dismissed without prejudice for failure to make disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) and failure to make a settlement demand. Objections to R&R due by 9/3/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 8/15/2009. (gh1, )
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER ADOPTING 46 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant Trilegiant Corporation's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 6/30/2009. (sc1, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND CANCELLING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - It is accordingly ORDERED: 1. The preliminary pretrial conference set for June 30, 2009, is CANCELLED. The Court's internal telephone system will not handle the number of parties involved in this case. The Court does not wish to incur the expense of arranging a conference call with an outside vendor if it is unclear whether Plaintiff will participate. 2. Defendants' counsel shall advise the Court forthwith whether Plaintiff has p rovided the disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). 3. Plaintiff is ordered to advise the Court in writing not later than July 8, 2009, of any specific objections he has to the proposed deadlines in the Rule 26(f) Report filed by Defendants ' counsel and, if so, of his alternative proposals. In the absence of any objections, the Courtwill enter a scheduling order consistent with that Report and Judge Rice's schedule. 4. Not later than July 8, 2009, Plaintiff shall show cause w hy he should not be sanctioned for his failure to comply with the Order for Preliminary Pretrial Conference. Plaintiff is expressly cautioned that any further failure to comply with procedural orders of the Court will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/24/2009. (kopf1, )
|
|
Filing
46
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DEFENDANT TRILEGIANTS MOTIONTO DISMISS - Given that Judge Rice has already decided that the Complaint states a claim for relief against Trilegiant, the Motion to Dismiss must be denied. Objections to R&R due by 6/29/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/11/2009. (kopf1, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF UPON FILING OF MOTION TO DISMISS OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/21/2009. (kopf1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
