Ealy v. Manning et al
| Larry E Ealy |
| James Manning, Adele Riley, Dave Vore and Gary Titus |
| 3:2009cv00047 |
| February 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Michael R Merz |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Because the Notice of Appeal does not confer jurisdiction on the Court of Appeals, the appeal is frivolous and the Motion to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis should therefore be denied and the Court should certify that the appeal is frivolous. Objections to R&R due by 6/15/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/27/2009. (kopf1, )
|
|
Filing
5
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING EALY'S OBJECTIONS (Doc. 4 ) AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING EALY'S COMPLAINT (Doc. 3 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 3/16/09. (bev1, )
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Complaint herein should be dismissed, with prejudice as to the First Cause of Actionand without prejudice as to the Second and Third Causes of Action. The Clerk is ORDERED not to issue process in this case pending further order of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 2/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/9/2009. (kopf1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
