Cochran v. Warden London Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Cochran v. Warden London Correctional Institution

Cochran v. Warden London Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Daryl Cochran
Respondent:	Warden London Correctional Institution
Case Number:	3:2009cv00150
Filed:	April 17, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	CLARK
Presiding Judge:	Michael R Merz
Presiding Judge:	Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 15, 2009	Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 - the Petition is Dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner is also Denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any request for certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 5/15/2009. (jdf1)
April 20, 2009	Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Because the Petition is barred by the statute of limitations, it should be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied any requested certificate of appealability and the Court should certify that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore could not proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 5/7/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/20/2009. (kopf1, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 15, 2009

Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 - the Petition is Dismissed with prejudice. Petitioner is also Denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any request for certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 5/15/2009. (jdf1)

April 20, 2009

Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Because the Petition is barred by the statute of limitations, it should be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied any requested certificate of appealability and the Court should certify that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore could not proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 5/7/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/20/2009. (kopf1, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cochran v. Warden London Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Daryl Cochran
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden London Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?