Langenkamp v. Warden Allen Correctional Institution
Toby Langenkamp |
Warden Allen Correctional Institution |
3:2009cv00201 |
May 21, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
SHELBY |
Michael R Merz |
Walter H Rice |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING RELIEF ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - The Motion to amend the judgment is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 1/11/2010. (kpf1) |
Filing 14 DECISION AND ORDER - It is ordered that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/10/2009. (kpf1) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT - ORAL ARGUMENT on Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed May 21, 2009, is hereby set for Wednesday, December 9, 2009 at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom #4, Fifth Floor Federal Building, 200 W. Second Street, Dayton , Ohio, before United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Petitioner's counsel will need to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to obtain Petitioner's presence at the hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/5/2009. (kpf1) |
Filing 4 AMENDED ORDER FOR ANSWER - It is hereby ORDERED that Respondent shall, not later than August 17, 2009, file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing §2254 Cases. The remainder of the Order for Answer filed May 22, 2009, remains in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 7/7/2009. (kopf1, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER FOR ANSWER - Upon preliminary consideration pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing §2254 Cases, the Court finds that it does not plainly appear from the face of the Petition and any exhibits attached thereto that the Petitioner is not e ntitled to relief in this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent shall, not later than July 2, 2009, file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing §2254 Cases. Petitioner may, not later than twe nty-one days after the Answer is filed, file and serve a reply to the Answer. If Respondent files a motion to dismiss, Petitioners time to file a memorandum in opposition will likewise be Twenty-one days from service, as provided in S. D. Ohio Civ. R . 7.2(a). The Clerk is ordered to serve the Petition on Respondent and the Attorney General of Ohio, c/o Assistant Attorney General Diane Mallory, Sections Coordinator, 150 E. Gay Street, 16th Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/22/2009. (gh1, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Langenkamp v. Warden Allen Correctional Institution | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Toby Langenkamp | |
Represented By: | Daniel Joseph O'Brien |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Allen Correctional Institution | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.