Sparkman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Sparkman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Sparkman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Patricia L Sparkman
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2009cv00272
Filed:	July 16, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Michael R Merz
Presiding Judge:	Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 29, 2010	Filing 20 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 18 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (Doc. 19 ) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OR DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF, AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/29/2010. (kje1)
September 11, 2009	Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS - This action was filed July 16, 2009. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), service must be completed within 120 days of filing. Although process has issued, there has been no return of service. Plaintiff is accordingly notified that unless proof of service is filed by November 13, 2009, the case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/11/2009. (kopf1, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 29, 2010

Filing 20 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 18 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (Doc. 19 ) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OR DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF, AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/29/2010. (kje1)

September 11, 2009

Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS - This action was filed July 16, 2009. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), service must be completed within 120 days of filing. Although process has issued, there has been no return of service. Plaintiff is accordingly notified that unless proof of service is filed by November 13, 2009, the case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 9/11/2009. (kopf1, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sparkman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia L Sparkman
Represented By:	Carla J Lauer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	John J Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?