Mitchell v. Commissioner of SSA
| Jeremiah Mitchell |
| Commissioner of SSA |
| 3:2009cv00276 |
| July 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| ADAMS |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ENTRY - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on May 21, 2012 (Doc. # 16 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #14) is GRANTED, in part, to the extent Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA award in the total amount of$2,656.25. Plaintiffs Motion for an EAJA award totaling $3,614.84 is DENIED; 3. Defendant is directed to verify, within twenty-one days of this Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United Statessubject to offset. Ifno such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant is ordered topay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiffs counsel; and, 4. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 06/08/12. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 14 ) be GRANTED, in part, to the extent Plaintiff is entitled to an EAJA award in the total amount of $2,656.25. Plainti ff's Motion for an EAJA award totaling $3,614.84 should be DENIED;2. Defendant be directed to verify, within twenty-one days of an Order adopting this Report and Recommendations, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the Unit ed States subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant be ordered to pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiff's counsel; and, 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 6/7/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 5/21/2012. (sc1)
|
|
Filing
12
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 10 ); PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS IN PART TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. 11 ) SUSTAINED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, REVERSING COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT AND REMANDING THE CAPTIONED MATTER TO THE DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER FOR THE PAYMENT OF BENEFITS CONSISTENT WITH THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/28/10. (cib1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mitchell v. Commissioner of SSA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeremiah Mitchell | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie D Dobson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of SSA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
