Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. All Tech Electronics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Projects Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant: All Tech Electronics, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv00284
Filed: July 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND 19 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is therefore ordered that Defendant's 8 Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or on forum non conveniens grounds be, and it hereby is denied. It is further ordered that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Claims Five and Six for failure to state a claim be, and it hereby is, granted. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 1/20/2010. (sc1, )
December 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - This case is before the Court on Defendant's Objections (Doc. No. 17) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 15) and Plaintiff's response (Doc. No. 18). It is again respectfully recommended that the Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction be denied. Objections to R&R due by 1/19/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/31/2009. (kpf1)
December 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - This case is before the Court on Motion to Dismiss of Defendant All Tech Electronics, Inc. (Doc. No. 8). All Tech seeks dismissal on three separate bases: (1) for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (2); (2) under the doctrine of forum non conveniens; and (3) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim in negligence. This Court may properly exercise specific personal jurisdiction over All Tech in this case and its motion to dism iss for lack of personal jurisdiction should be denied. All Tech is certainly not entitled to dismissal on the basis of forum non conveniens and it has also not established entitlement to transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Claims for Relief Five and Six should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Objections to R&R due by 12/24/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 12/5/2009. (kpf1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. All Tech Electronics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Projects Unlimited, Inc.
Represented By: Richard Albert Talda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: All Tech Electronics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?