Hall v. USA

Petitioner:	David W. Hall
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	3:2009cv00396
Filed:	October 19, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Michael R Merz
Presiding Judge:	Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 23, 2011	Filing 62 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied and the Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that the appeal is objectively frivolous. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 5/19/2011. (kje1) (NOTE: Docket number will be changed to Doc. 62 as filed in the criminal case.) Modified on 5/24/2011 (mdf1).
March 5, 2010	Filing 45 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 43 IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PETITIONER/DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING 44 OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF AN D AGAINST PETITIONER/DEFENDANT, DENYING PETITIONER/DEFENDANT'S MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2255 WITH PREJUDICE; CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 3/5/2010. (jwd1) Modified on 3/5/2010 (jwd1). Modified on 3/8/2010 (pb1).

Date Filed

Document Text

May 23, 2011

Filing 62 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied and the Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that the appeal is objectively frivolous. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 5/19/2011. (kje1) (NOTE: Docket number will be changed to Doc. 62 as filed in the criminal case.) Modified on 5/24/2011 (mdf1).

March 5, 2010

Filing 45 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 43 IN THEIR ENTIRETY; PETITIONER/DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING 44 OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF AN D AGAINST PETITIONER/DEFENDANT, DENYING PETITIONER/DEFENDANT'S MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2255 WITH PREJUDICE; CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 3/5/2010. (jwd1) Modified on 3/5/2010 (jwd1). Modified on 3/8/2010 (pb1).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Mona Guerrier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: David W. Hall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?