Brewer v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
| William C Brewer |
| Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
| 3:2009cv00462 |
| December 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Michael R Merz |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 28 AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 31 OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; (2) OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 ; (3) DISMISSING PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 ; (4) DENYING LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS ANY REQUESTED CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND (5) TERMINATING THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/27/2010. (jwd1)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER - Petitioner has been in the practice of writing argument on the outside of envelopes when transmitting papers to the court. This practice makes it extremely difficult to place the argument in the record by electronic scanning. Therefore, this practice is ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED. Any further argument made on the outside of the envelope will be disregarded and the envelope will be shredded. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/24/2010. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ON MOTION REGARDING POSSIBLE EVIDENTIARY HEARING - Petitioner should let the Court know whether he will consent without the conditions of the personal participation by Attorney General Cordray. With respect to Petitioners recommendation that Judge Mark Painter participate as a judge on this case, is not possible as he is not a judge of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/28/2010. (gh1)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Respondents Motion to Vacate Judgment is GRANTED and the case is hereby restored to the active docket of the United States Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Dayton, for further consideration. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 04/06/10. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
7
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING BREWERS OBJECTIONS (Doc. # 4 ) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. # 3 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY; DISMISSING BREWERS PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITH PREJUDICE; DENYING LEAVE TO APPEAL INFORMA PAUPERIS; DENYING ANY REQUESTED CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND TERMINATING THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 01/06/10. (pb1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brewer v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William C Brewer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
