Hale v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Hale v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Hale v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Betty Hale
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number:	3:2009cv00483
Filed:	December 22, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Sharon L Ovington
Presiding Judge:	Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 3, 2013	Filing 18 DECISION AND ENTRY granting 17 Motion for Attorney Fees - The Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b)(1) in the amount of $9,000.00; and The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 09/03/13. (pb1)
February 15, 2011	Filing 15 DECISION and ENTRY: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on January 26, 2011 (Doc. # 14 ) are ADOPTED in full; 2. The ALJ's non-disability determination is VACATED; 3. No finding is made regarding whether Plaintiff is under a "disabil ity" within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 4. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with this Report and Recommendations and with any decision adopting this Report and Recommendations; and 5. The case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 2/15/11. (bac1)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 3, 2013

Filing 18 DECISION AND ENTRY granting 17 Motion for Attorney Fees - The Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b)(1) in the amount of $9,000.00; and The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 09/03/13. (pb1)

February 15, 2011

Filing 15 DECISION and ENTRY: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on January 26, 2011 (Doc. # 14 ) are ADOPTED in full; 2. The ALJ's non-disability determination is VACATED; 3. No finding is made regarding whether Plaintiff is under a "disabil ity" within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 4. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with this Report and Recommendations and with any decision adopting this Report and Recommendations; and 5. The case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 2/15/11. (bac1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hale v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Hale
Represented By:	Gary Marc Blumenthal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By:	John J Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?