Knight v. State of Ohio Custody of Timmerman Cooper
| Tyrcne Knight |
| State of Ohio Custody of Timmerman Cooper and Warden, London Correctional Institution |
| 3:2010cv00068 |
| February 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
CLERK'S JUDGMENT AFFIRMING 15 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. (mr1)
|
|
Filing
14
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge concludes that the court of appeals decision is not an objectively unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court precedent nor based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in l ight of the evidence before the state courts and that Petitioner should be granted a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Objections to R&R due by 3/5/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 02/17/12. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER TRANSFERRING REFERENCE. The referral of the above-captioned matter is hereby transferred from Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington to the docket of Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz. Signed by Magistrate Judges Michael R Merz and Sharon L. Ovington on 2/7/2012. (mdf1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
