Stolle Machinery Company v. RAM Precision Industries et al
| Stolle Machinery Company |
| RAM Precision Industries, Kenneth M. Fultz, Shu An and Suzhou SLAC Precision |
| 3:2010cv00155 |
| April 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Walter H Rice |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY- The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the par ties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Americ a, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 10/5/16. (kma)
|
|
Filing
79
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIF'S MOTION FOR FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b) CERTIFICATION OF PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT AND STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL (DOC. # 77 ); ADMINISTRATIVELY PROCESSING CASE. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 8/22/2013. (jdf1)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER - It is accordingly ORDERED that Defendants show cause in writing not later than November 10, 2012, why they should not be precluded from introducing lay witness testimony and all parties show cause by that date why they should not be precluded from introducing expert testimony. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 10/31/2012. (kpf1)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 34 Motion - On Consent Motion of the parties (Doc. No. 34 ) and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for the disclosure of lay witnesses be extended to and including July 16, 2012, the deadline for Stolle Ma chinery Company, LLC, to make a settlement demandbe extended to and including July 16, 2012, and that the deadline for the parties to identify expert witnesses and exchange expert reports is extended to and including to and including July 27, 2012.Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/29/2012. (kf)
|
|
Filing
30
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS SHU AN AND SUZHOU SLAC PRECISION EQUIPMENT CO. LTD.'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 14 ); DISMISSING COUNTS VII AND IX WITH PREJUDICE; CONFERENCE CALL SET FOR 12/27/2011 AT 9:00 AM BEFORE JUDGE WALTER H. RICE. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 12/14/11. (cib1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
