Lopez-Ramirez v. Kimpel
Petitioner: Daniel Lopez-Ramirez
Respondent: Dean A Kimpel
Case Number: 3:2010cv00182
Filed: May 10, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: SHELBY
Presiding Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DECISION AND ENTRY - It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on May 27, 2010 (Doc. 5 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 2 ) is DENIED; 3. A certificate of appealability under 28 USC §2255(c) shall not issue; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/17/10. (cib1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopez-Ramirez v. Kimpel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Lopez-Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dean A Kimpel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?